Leyland P76 Owners 2004 |
Technical problem |
|
[215V8] LPG Compression Ratio
Question
- I'm planning on building a 4.0L/4.6L stroker with large-valve 300 heads to run on LPG (propane).
- I can improve my efficiency if I use a CR of 11:1 - 12:1.
- Anyone know what CR I can safely and reliably run the engine on? Warm
- Regards
- Shawn
Answer
- Hello Shawn,
- As you know, propane has a much higher octane rating than the best available
- pump gasoline -- nominally 105 octane on the R+M/2 scale. That said, there are
- a number of factors that effect an engine's octane requirements. Each of the
- following can have an influence: camshaft timing and duration (overlap),
- cylinder head design, bore diameter, spark plug location, material of construction
- (aluminum is more tolerant), engine temperature, air temperature and ignition
- timing.
- I have zero experience with the 4.0L/4.6L stroker or the Buick 300 heads but
- I do have experience with the Oldsmobile and Buick versions of the 215 and
- also with propane.
- It is my understanding that the Oldsmobile head is more detonation resistant
- than the Buick head. My reading has also led me to believe that the Buick head
- actually flows a bit better than the Olds, thus providing more top end power.
- Now for my real world, first hand experience. I built a Buick 215 for my
- wife's Chevy Vega. That engine had a mild camshaft, about 8.5 to 1 static
- compression, ran premium grade (91 octane) and never detonated. The second engine was
- an Olds 215 using the small chamber heads along with high domed Arias pistons
- yielding a ratio of 13.5 to 1. The camshaft profile was non-stock but rather
- mild. That engine did not detonate at its home altitude of 4,000 FT but did at
- sea-level -- even using 93-octane fuel. Initial time for both engine was set
- at 10 degrees BTDC but the 13.5 to 1 engine needed to be backed down to 5
- degrees initial to forestall detonation at sea level.
- Now to propane. The Vega and Buick engine were ultimately sold. The Olds
- version of the 215 was rebuilt and sits in my son's Corvair. Here is my logic:
- If that high compression engine could survive on 91 octane gasoline -- it would
- dearly love 105 octane propane.
- Again, I have no experience with the 4 liter or 4.6 liter engines nor do I
- have experience with the Buick 300 heads but my personal experience would say
- that you should have few problems with propane at the compression levels you
- anticipate.
- Some of our British and Australian list members may have different
- experiences based on the use of propane in the Rover products. But I believe that most
- of those applications were duel fuel and not optimized for propane.
- http://www.propanecarbs.com/propane.html Propane Facts & Comparison Charts
- http://www.patooyee.com/propane/propane_1.htm Propane: Page 1
- Darius
Another reply
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006
- Back in the '80s I used to work for Petrolane, the propane gas distriburor, and we did conversions.
- If I remember correctly the max recommended compression ratio was about 10.5:1.
- Even though propane is high octane (110) since it is a dry gas, you don't get and evaporative cooling of the
- charge, making it somewhat susceptible to detonation at high compression ratios.
- I am working from memory here but will try and dig up some info if there is interest.
- P Knowles
|
|
|
|
Last updated Dec, 2005 |
This web site may contain Copyright material
If you find any problems with the site, please email the
Web Editor |
|